How Biden Plans to Give U.S. Sovereignty to the World Health Organization
March 4, 2023 10:14am
The COVID-19 pandemic was used by governments around the world to impose severe and devastating lockdowns of economies and of populations. Here in the United States, under the guise of protecting us from an illness that 71.38% of us didn't get, and that 98.92% of those who did get it survived, elected tyrants suspended our constitutional rights to the free exercise of religion; peaceable assembly; free press; keeping and bearing arms; freedom from unreasonable and warrantless searches; not being deprived of liberty or property without due process of law; speedy and public trials; and bail.
Most of that was done at the state level. But when Joe Biden was inaugurated, he imposed additional unconstitutional mandates nationwide. And if you think that was bad, just wait 'til next time. Because next time it may not be elected tyrants in Washington micromanaging your life and restricting your freedoms; it may be bureaucrats in Geneva at the World Health Organization doing so.
The Biden administration says it will sign a legally binding agreement that would give control of America's health care policy to the WHO. In the event of a health emergency, the United States and all other signatories would be obligated to follow the directives of the WHO regarding medical treatments, global supply chains, vaccine mandates, societal lockdowns, and surveilling populations for compliance.
While it is being promoted as something that would benefit us during the next pandemic, the truth is that it would allow the WHO to dictate ALL health care policies in the United States at any time. The current draft of this agreement authorizes the WHO to dictate health care both during a pandemic AND "during inter-pandemic times." In other words, the WHO can ALWAYS dictate polices because there are only two times: pandemic times and inter-pandemic times.
The agreement mandates that health care is provided equally to all without regard for ability to pay. And that doesn't just mean the United States would have to provide free health care to the poor people America; we would have to provide it to poor people around the world. It demands that countries deny protection of intellectual property rights to providers of vaccines and other health care products. And it calls for "resilient health systems, rooted in universal health coverage."
And since no Leftist agenda can be without diversity, equity, and inclusion, the agreement demands that every nation will "take steps to address the social, environmental and economic determinants of health, and vulnerability conditions that contribute to the emergence and spread of pandemics, and prevent or mitigate the socioeconomic impacts of pandemics, including but not limited to, those affecting economic growth, the environment, employment, trade, transport, gender equality, education, social assistance, housing, food insecurity, nutrition and culture, and especially for persons in vulnerable situations."
This treaty will turn over U.S. sovereignty vis a vis health care to the World Health Organization. But what is health care? Health care can be anything and everything! From the food we eat to the cars we drive to the places we live, EVERYTHING can have a health care angle attributed to to it. According to the Leftists, what is the greatest threat to public health? Climate Change, right? So you can expect the WHO to meddle in rules to limit carbon emissions to mitigate their mythological anthropogenic climate change. And since EVERYTHING can be said to affect the climate, the WHO could potentially dictate terms in all aspects of our lives.
Democrats say the biggest health care emergency in America is guns. Will the WHO try to infringe upon our right to keep and bear arms? Don't put it past 'em. There is no angle the Left will not use to deny us our constitutional rights. So don't be surprised if the WHO tells you to register or turn in your firearms. Our First Amendment rights may be denied under the guise of preventing "health care disinformation."
This treaty has the potential to establish a worldwide police state controlled by the WHO that will micromanage every aspect of our lives. But do not expect the Senate to block this treaty. By calling it an "executive agreement" instead of calling it the "treaty" that it is, Biden has no intention of submitting it to the Senate for ratification. And he might get away with that.
In the 1920 case of Missouri v. Holland, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that states were bound by international treaties. Then in 1937, the high court in U.S. v. Belmont expanded that to include executive agreements that were not treaties. Justice Sutherland wrote in that unanimous opinion that different kinds of treaties existed which did not require Senate approval but were nonetheless binding.
Mat Staver, the founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel and I discussed this issue on today's Mike Bates Show, which is now archived online as a podcast at www.TheMikeBatesShow.com/podcasts/230304.
Keep an eye on this back door imposition of global tyranny upon us. The propaganda press has made the intentional decision to not report this threat to our Republic. But I assure you, it is very real. Trust but verify, right? Check the links I've included in this post for the raw sources.
Is there no limit to what the Democrats will do to destroy U.S. sovereignty? It appears not. Stolen elections have consequences.